My shopping cart
Your cart is currently empty.Continue Shopping
For me as a painter, realism has been the style that best describes my artistic attitude since the late 1980s. With my personal experience on the one hand as a painter of realistic pictures (meanwhile there are about 500 of them) and on the other hand as an art teacher (as such I worked for almost 40 years) I should be able to give interested readers an idea and more concrete image of realism in art. Hopefully this idea will increase the pleasure and the gain of knowledge in the reception of this style or attitude.
This is the striving to represent sensually experienced reality as faithfully as possible by artistic means in all its manifestations, even if these are unpleasant and unattractive. However, this should not only be understood in the sense of an objectively perceived and faithfully reproduced reality, but also as an expression of the subjective view and personal mode of representation of the respective artist.
In all branches of art, such as literature, fine arts, music, are realistic approaches ever since people began to be artistically active. In the fine arts (painting, graphics, sculpture) are for example:
1) the animal representation in the cave painting, which due to the hunting magic the typical characteristics of the respective animals exactly capture
2 the emperor portraits of the Roman empire (as coins or as sculptures) , in which the individual physiognomy of the rulers is worked out
2a the painterly representation of the individual in the Gothic period
3 the perspective construction of space and
3a the sensitive emphasis of materiality in the Renaissance
in the Baroque period 4 the precise capture and representation of light effects and illumination
and in the Dutch genre painting 5 of the 17th century, the most important aspect it is the detailed depiction of the individual Century are it in detail described scenes of the everyday life.
??????????? Characteristics of realism specifically in painting are:
Gustav Courbet (1819 - 1877) established the term "realism" in 1955. In that year, the Paris Salon, back then the world's most important exhibition of contemporary art, was held as part of the World's Fair. After some of his submitted works were juried out, he organized his own exhibition parallel to the Paris Salon. In this exhibition about 40 of his works were shown. He titled this exhibition "Le Réalisme."
Courbet and like-minded painters of the era, such as Honoré Daumier (1808 - 1877), Jean-Francois Millet (1814 - 1875), Adolph von Menzel (1815 - 1905), Wilhelm Leibl (1844 - 1900) and Ilya Repin (1844 - 1930), opposed the conventions of classicism and romanticism in the idealistic and academic art. They wanted to create living art.
In politically motivated works, these artists turned their attention to social reality in a socially critical way and also brought the lower class (mainly industrial workers and peasants) to the center of attention. It was their concern to show the public their hard everyday working life and precarious living conditions in a factual way, without idealizing them.6
In landscape painting 7, artists of the "School of Barbizon" (especially Camille Corot 1796 - 1876, Charles-Francois Daubigny 1817 - 1878, Jean-Francois Millet 1814 - 1875, Théodore Rousseau 1811 - 1867 and Constant Troyon 1810 - 1865) were important for this epoch in addition to Courbet. Their pictorial subjects were sections of nature, which they reproduced unidealized in accordance with their realistic basic attitude. These artists had found their retreat from the big city of Paris in the forest of Fontainebleau and devoted themselves there to open-air painting (plein air painting). Painting directly in nature was made easier for them by the fact that oil paints in tubes had become commercially available in the mid-19th century.
By painting outdoors, the artists were able to closely observe the light with its changes during the course of the day and depict it in a way that made them pioneers of Impressionism.
( *For copyright reasons it was unfortunately not possible for me to include suitable picture examples in chapter III. But all mentioned artists can be found easily in the internet. )
The New Objectivity established itself in the German Empire between World War I and World War II. Important representatives of this direction include Christian Schad, Karl Hubbuch, Rudolf Schlichter, Karl Grossberg, Anton Räderscheidt, George Grosz,Otto Dix and Max Beckmann.
Often the consequences of the First World War are shown and processed with socially critical themes. With an explicitly objective style of representation, the artists distanced themselves from tendencies of abstraction, especially from Cubism on the one hand and from emotionally charged Expressionism on the other.
American Realism developed at the beginning of the 20th century in the USA, when artists there (for example Edward Hopper, Charles Sheeler, Grant Wood, Andrew Wyeth, Philip Pearlstein and Alice Neel) explicitly distanced themselves from the European avant-garde with its abstracting tendencies. It is considered the first independent art movement in the USA. Typical of this current of realist painting is the description of the American lifestyle in everyday and socially critical pictorial content.
From 1930 in the then Soviet Union and then from 1949 in the then German Democratic Republic, Socialist Realism became the dominant art movement. It was prescribed by state order for all artists, and the state was the main commissioning body for artists.
It seems very questionable whether this style is accurately described by the term "realism". For the emphasis of this direction is not the unadorned reproduction of reality, but the glorification of the working class and the peasantry in a propagandistic manner.
Photorealism developed from the 1960s onwards, mainly in the USA and Europe. It became known to a wider audience through Dokumenta 5 in 1972.
The artists took slides, which they projected onto canvas, as a model and painted, often very large-format, images. They worked them out in such detail that the boundaries between photography and painting became blurred. They were not, as is often criticized, concerned only with technical perfection. In particular, they also tried to reveal the shortcomings (e.g. blurring due to movement or lack of depth of field and color cast) of the seemingly perfect medium of photography with their painting.
Since the painting style of the Photorealists shows little of their own handwriting, the artists tried to distinguish themselves from one another by specializing in certain themes. Artists who can be mentioned here are, for example: Chuck Close (oversized faces), Ralph Goings (fast food restaurants), Robert Cottingham (neon signs), Richard Estes (city views), Franz Gertsch (portraits and grasses).
Claudio Bravo (1936-2011)
Lucian Freud (1922-2011)
Johannes Grützke (1937-2017)
Antonio Lopez Garcia (b. 1936)
Erwin Pfrang (b. 1951)
Gerhard Richter (b. 1932)
In the case of these artists, I think it is still too early or it will not even be possible to classify them in art historical pigeonholes.
However, it is a personal concern of mine to mention them in this context, because they are of great importance to me and my art of painting.
There are two things I particularly like about the painting that I would like to point out:
how the shadows of the vase woman and the African statue connect the floor, the wall and the painting hanging above, and
how a correspondence is created between the bowl on the head of the vase woman and the plate on the painting on the wall.
I painted this picture after a photo I had taken in the city center of Augsburg, when just two people walked past a fashion store. The scene is full of contrasts: In the store window are four fashion mannequins on display, all blond, young, and elegantly and modernly dressed in black and white. The two persons are an older, gray-haired couple wearing plain blue clothes.
The couple moves from left to right, three of the fashion mannequins have their heads turned to the left.
There is no communication or interaction between the six figures in the picture. Merely as a random constellation of the moment, there is an optical connection between the two people and the fashion mannequin, whose head is facing forward. The viewer's gaze is led diagonally into the depths of the room from the older woman in front via her attendant to the doll.
For the rest, stepped planes parallel to the picture prevail towards the back: The lettering on the window pane at the bottom left, the row of four mannequins, the yellow background of the left and the white background of the right part of the window. On the window pane the facades of the opposite stores and the couple with their shopping bag are reflected.
In the painting with the everyday street scene I proceeded in the manner of the photorealists: I projected a slide onto the canvas and drew the contours in pencil. The painting is built up in many thin, glazing layers of paint to achieve the desired depth of color. Soft hair brushes enabled me to bring out the color transitions so subtly that the effect of the different lighting from the spotlights in the store on the one hand and the cold daylight on the street on the other stood out clearly.
The delicate glazes also allowed me to reproduce " photorealistically" the reflections on the shop window (for example, the mirrored writing in the upper right corner and the reflection of the couple on the border between the white and the yellow background of the minimalist window dressing).
This method of painting, which does not reveal any brushstrokes and no artistic handwriting, is well suited to depict smooth material very realistically, such as that from which the mannequins are made. The vividness of the couple's skin and hair, on the other hand, I could only bring out by applying the colors more impasto. The difficulty here was not to impair the uniform painterly overall impression of the painting.